AI and exams

* English translations of the documents:
-   Overview of the admissibility of AI applications in written examinations
-  Declaration of Originality

THM students implicitly confirm that they have completed it independently. All sources (e.g., numbers, images, texts) and tools (e.g., software, AI systems) used in the creation of the work must be named, and all direct or indirect quotations and quotations must be clearly identified. This is regulated by  Section 11a Paragraph 1 of the General Provisions for Bachelor's Examination Regulations , which came into effect in the summer semester of 2024. In addition, we now offer an "Overview of Permissible AI Applications in Written Examinations" and a " Recommendation for the Labeling of AI in Written Examinations," along with a template for a "university-wide Declaration of Originality ." These documents help clarify the use and handling of AI in written examination work such as term papers, theses, and seminar papers (not in written exams).

The examiners decide on the use of the documents, and the module coordinators determine the content – ​​with the exception of the theses, which are determined in consultation with the examiners. The use of the documents should initially be understood as a recommendation for a trial run, which will be evaluated.

Press reviews
 Please give us your feedback:
  • Students, interested parties: This email address is protected against spambots! JavaScript must be enabled to view it!
  • Lecturers, staff: here
  • Changelog

Do you have any questions? Please check out our FAQs: